Don't you all have this fantasy about going back in time and getting a re-do with the benefit of what you know now? I mean, countless movies are based on this idea, it's gotta be pretty universal. Anyway, I know I have it. Sometimes I have the conversation that I wish I would have had with someone I haven't seen for years, if only I knew then what I know now. But the thing is, I'm still having the real-time conversations where I only know what I know now, no matter what age I am, and later on I'm sure I'm going to want a re-do for some of these too. That whole thing about how you can't step in the same river twice and all - I know by the time I get my other foot in it's all changed. So all in all, I think the best thing about getting older is continuing to be alive and getting to have more experiences, make more mistakes, have more imaginary conversations in the future where I tell myself how I could have been so much more clever in this moment, step into more rivers just that one time. It's just getting more days, more kisses, more joy, more sun on skin and chilly mornings and more warming up the cold blankets with body heat at night, more conversations and books to read and music to hear and more time to maybe learn to juggle or ride a unicycle. The best thing about getting older is the time involved, and everything that holds. Just more. I don't ever want to leave.
Access: Public
Print
views (48)
It seems to me that we're all built almost completely out of caring, maybe too much of it sometimes. What we care about varies from person to person and then we start caring about those differences and we get in big fights about it and have wars and do stupid things. Sometimes we let marketers and advertisers convince us that we need to care about their things and that we'll be happier by caring about those things but it isn't true. We invent religions to tell us what to care about and new age bookstores and fashion magazines. Some of us follow sports teams and care about them passionately - we just don't know what to do with the caring, there's so much of it, and we seem to need to put it somewhere. I think I'm in favor of a bit more apathy, kind of benign apathy, seconds on end of not being personally invested in anything in particular and letting all things just be what they are. Maybe I will start a religion of apathy - but of course, if the followers are any good at it at all they'll never show up.
Access: Public
Print
views (74)
It is so tempting, so many times a day, to pretend that whatever I'm experiencing was inflicted on me. The dog is driving me crazy, that really bad driver pissed me off, I'm happy because I got paid more than I expected. It came from somewhere and it's because of something and that something IS NOT ME, no, you can't make me be responsible for that! But in that whole Victor Frankl, even in a concentration camp there's that space where you choose your response kind of way, personal freedom is inescapable and it's identical at heart with personal responsiblity. You know that thing that everyone says and I have no idea if it's true but that thing about how the Chinese character for crisis is the same as opportunity? It should be true if it isn't. Anyway, it's just like that. It isn't that personal freedom and personal responsibility go together, it's that they are just one thing with two words stuck to it. And there isn't an option not to have it.
I am going for the world's record for run on sentences. What do you think?
My personal little NaNoWriMo - 50k words in one sentence...
Access: Public
Print
views (75)
It's complicated, isn't it? I can see a lot of ways that things aren't working but not necessarily how they would work better. I can appreciate a lot of compelling and yet nearly opposite viewpoints, everyone from Ayn Rand to Michael Moore, but putting ideas into actual practice often yields very different results from making a good argument. So many ideas that seemed good on the surface have fallen apart, everything from communism to capitalism, all kinds of socialism, and economic systems are inextricable from the political systems they occupy. Very complicated. Somewhere along the way, it seems to me that systems fail because kindness and generosity are overwhelmed by fear and greed - either at the top of the economic hierarchy or at the bottom or somewhere in the middle, people are looking out of the corner of their eyes and worrying about getting all they can -- screw everyone else, screw this stupid system, I'm taking what I can get.
The way it is now, we live in such a non-global economy in a very global culture. I think I should be sharing more because I have so much, but the truth is, in my economy and world I have very little and we barely break even. I can't complain about needing to rewire our house when a lot of the world doesn't have electricity to start with, but we still have to scrounge for the money even to do the work ourselves. We're waiting for help to put in our new hot water heater and haven't had hot water for about a month. (It's been less of a problem than you might think - and luckily, we have a place to go shower.) I wouldn't be able to walk past masses of starving people and worry about my hot water, but I don't walk by them and so I have to consciously decide to think about issues that aren't in front of me and consciously decide how to help, what to give and what to give up and it's hard. I don't know how to fix this.
But then also, the disparities sometimes pay off. It's only in the places where there is some "extra" in the economy where research gets done, advances are made, we screw up enough that we start figuring out how to do stuff in a more ecologically sound way, stuff like that. Good stuff. But it's hard to know how to think about it all. I mean, on the global scale, it's all a choice, so are the starving people in third world countries in effect paying for the research that went into our Prius? (And by the way, we only have it because it's a company car. It's a nice car but I wouldn't buy a Prius.) The whole world could live modestly on what we've got as a planet, but would the folks living really well be willing to give anything up? I don't think that's likely. And I don't know what would be sacrificed if that happened.
It's complicated.
Access: Public
Print
views (73)
World peace.
Discovering my superpower.
Winning the lottery (although I supose I would have to buy at least one ticket...)
My 120th birthday. With a long hike and then some yoga and a party with all my friends.
Finishing the outbuildings and greenhouse we haven't started yet.
A year round harvest next year with the cold frames that are going in in the spring.
My 70th anniversary with Krissy.
Finding my coyote claw necklace - which of course is hiding, being trickstery and all.
Love and life and all the sweet juicy everyday goodness of it all, every single today.
Access: Public
Print
views (47)
I had a peculiar childhood. I was the only child of older parents and spent most of my time among adults, or in my own made up world. I was good at things, good with words and good with math and good at climbing trees and building faerie houses, but the one thing that stood out most was that I could draw, the way some people have perfect pitch. Even as a first grader I could draw with perfect perspective and put almost anything I saw down on paper. Not only that, but I had this loose, kind of impressionistic style that was way beyond my age. It was kind of my parlor trick, the rabbit I would draw out of my hat to impress people.
It's odd, because I had a pretty privileged life, that I never had an eye exam until I was twelve. And at that time it was discovered that a) I had no measurable depth perception and b) I was blind as a bat. Glasses were a revelation, but I never liked wearing them until at sixteen I got contacts. I drew the way I drew because the world looked flat to me, so it was easy to translate what I saw to a piece of paper, and because I saw the world as impressionistic blobs and swirls. But, crisis/opportunity, that ability to put what I see on paper stuck, regardless of contact lenses and possibly in spite of art instruction, and I got to keep my gift.
The other source of major pride was my ability to jerk my snoopy, overbearing, mean-spirited mother around. I was an expert at leaving trails of red herrings, at very calculated deceptions and delicious defiance. I drover her mad and I was very proud of it. Actually, I'm still proud of myself. I didn't bother often with being mad at her for being the way she was, I just figured out how to have the life I wanted and to be entertained by the process and how to get out of there as fast as possible without sacrificing my future (I much preferred being a sixteen year old starting college to being a sixteen year old runaway). It was a great learning experience and it's served me well all along the way. So thanks, mom!
Looking back from the grown-up perspective, I'm most proud that I learned to make myself happy, beyond most immediate circumstances. It's a good skill to have. And I still like doing artwork.
Access: Public
Print
views (43)